 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| Take A Stand For 9/11 Truth ts911t.org Historical Record Of Contacts To Members Of The Senate & The House Of Representatives On 9/11 Truth ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Congressman Ed Markey Has Been Served 9/11 Truth Information Congratulations to local 9/11 Boston activists on a great job at the Ed Markey forum yesterday in Framingham. We got into at least two newspapers in his district (linked below). Notice the slick response Markey gave regarding the question of controlled demolition: It's incontrovertibly true (that) the terrorist-piloted planes caused the attacks. Markey cleverly swapped the word "collapses" with "attacks." Markey must have gone to the Slick Willie school of politics. But few of his constituents were fooled. Everyone heard the question. Everyone knew his answer intentionally skirted it. This was a huge success for the truth movement. It's now been documented that Markey was introduced to the science of 9-11 on 2/3/08, and that he also pledged to look further into it. Congressman Ed Markey can no longer credibly play dumb on the issue of 9-11. Waltham paper: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT03VdyhKE4&eurl=http://www.911blogger.com/blog ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To Congresswoman Gwen Moore, January 31st, 2008 I'm writing to inform you about a serious concern I have regarding our national security. This very serious concern has to do with the validity of our government's official account of 9/11/01 called The 9/11 Commission Report. This report is now being questioned by millions of Americans. Many well known patriotic American citizens have and are now questioning this report and many of the families of the victims have questioned this report. Some members on the 9/11 Commission have also questioned their access to vital information while on the 9/11 Commission. Here are some of the articles listing the American citizens who have given statements that question the validity of this report: December 4th, 2007 Eight Senior Republican Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 - "Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False" http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_071202_seven_senior_republi.htm September 23rd, 2007 Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070922_seven_cia_veterans_c.htm December 13th, 2007 Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientist Call For New 9/11 Investigation http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_071211_seven_senior_federal.htm January 5th, 2008 Eight U.S. State Dept. Veterans Challenge Official Count of 9/11/01 http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_080104_eight_u_s__state_dep.htm January 14th, 2008 Twenty-Five US Military Officers Challenge Official Count of 9/11/01 http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_080112_twenty_five_u_s__mil.htm The following passage is from the website http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivorshtml Many 9/11 survivors and many 9/11 victim family members have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11. The public statements of many survivors contradict the Commission Report. And the words and actions of some of the victims on that terrible day are in conflict with the Commission Report. This section is a collection of their statements. This website is not an organization and it should be made clear that none of these individuals are affiliated with this website. Listed below are statements by more than 200 9/11 survivors, victims and family members that contradict or are critical of the 9/11 Commission Report. Their collective voices give credibility to the claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically flawed. These individuals cannot be simply dismissed as irresponsible believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. Their statements are based on their intimate familiarity with and intense study of the events of 9/11. Their criticism of the Commission Report is not inherently irresponsible or illogical. In fact, it is based on their desire to honor the victims of that terrible day by finding the truth and bringing to justice those responsible for these terrible acts. Here's the site to read the listed statements: http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html As stated earlier, we also have members of the 9/11 Commission who are questioning their access to vital information, while on the 9/11 Commission, as stated in this article: http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/01/cia- obstructed-911-commission-probe.php Former 9/11 Commission Member, Senator Max Cleland resigned from the 9/11 Commission. In November 2003, after the White House set conditions for the examination of documents Cleland said, “If this decision stands, I, as a member of the commission, cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised.” Anyone with reasonable intellect and sound judgment should be able to see that Americans were not told the truth about 9/11. All that is necessary is to take the time to research this event using alternative media and the internet to evaluate the evidence that contradicts the 9/11 Commission Report. This includes reading all kinds of articles, some of them are documented news reports and some of them are scientific in nature. You can watch 9/11 Truth documentaries on the internet or on DVD’s. You can also listen to or read speeches, lectures and statements by credible American citizens. Finally, you can observe pictures and video reports on the internet and listen to alternative media internet radio shows that contradict the government’s official account of 9/11/01. We need a citizen’s independent investigation created to verify that the American public wasn’t told the truth about the events of 9/11/01. I'm asking you to call for this type of investigation. We don’t need history to repeat itself by having those that are suspected of treason create their own investigative commission, selecting most of the ones they want to be on the commission and then producing a report such as the 9/11 Commission Report. At the present time there are millions of American citizens that are questioning the validity of our government’s official account of 9/11/01. The security of our nation and its people are at great risk now, and in the future, if we don't get to the truth about 9/11/01. You took an oath to protect the American citizens from enemies foreign and domestic. The critical information that is being provided to you in this letter, regarding the validity of our government's official account of 9/11/01, should give you enough incentive to look further and investigate/research this information. I have links to over 100 sites that have researched and investigated 9/11. Go to: http://www.ts911t. org/ and click on these links for extensive information that questions the validity of our government's official account of 9/11/01. When your investigative research is completed I expect you to call for a citizen's independent investigation of 9/11/01. The 9/11 Commission Report is now shown to be flawed and questionable. Only a citizen's independent investigation, with full subpoena powers, will give the most comprehensive and accurate account of the events, before, during and after September 11th, 2001. As a constituent of the State of Wisconsin, and as a veteran who served his country honorably in Vietnam, I will be expecting a response to this letter in a reasonable amount of time. This letter will be documented (copied), a sort of historical record, to verify that you were informed of this critical and serious concern regarding our national security. You have now been informed that the validity of our government’s official account of 9/11/01 is both flawed and questionable and that a citizen’s independent investigation is being called for by one of your constituents. This letter will be e-mailed and delivered by registered mail to your congressional office. I will finish this letter with a quote from Martin Luther King Jr.: "There comes a time when silence is betrayal". Matthew Naus e-mail: nausmr@yahoocom Retired Grade School Teacher & Vietnam Veteran Founder Of: Take A Stand For 9/11 Truth Website (ts911t.org) Co-Founder Of: Veterans For 9/11 Truth Website (v911t.org) Label/Receipt Number: 2306 1570 0000 3487 3683 Status: Delivered Your item was delivered at 3:27 PM on February 1, 2008 in MILWAUKEE, WI 53202. The item was signed for by G MOORE. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Each Senator's Military Legislative Assistant (MLA) Received This DVD On Or About September 12th, 2006 Debunking The Official Version Of The 9/11 Events Presented by Sam Lwin, ex-Marine (www.dove911.com) DVD Format for PC and MAC only DEDICATED TO THE LIVES WE LOST THAT DAY Video & Webpage Highlights 1) 911 In Plane Site (Absurdities of the Pentagon Attack)-Dave vonKleist, Radio Host 2) Loose Change (Uncovering the Official Lies of 9/11)- Dyan Avery, Oneanta College 3) 9/11 Eyewitness (Video Analysis of WTC Collapses)- Rick Siegel, WTC Employee 4) William Rodriguez (WTC Basement Explosion Before the First Plane Strike)-Hero 5) Prof. Steven E. Jones (Laws of Physics Suspension on Day of 9/11)-BY University 6) 911 Revisited (Strong Evidence of WTC Controlled Demolitions) Dustin Mugford 7) Painful Deceptions ((Explosives Used in WTC & Media Blackout)- Eric Hufschmid 8) Professor David Ray Griffin (The 9/11 Commission Report Fraud)-Theologian 9) The Great Conspiracy (Norad Stand Down & 9/11 Coverup)-Barry Zwicker 10) Deconstructing the 9/11 Myth (15 + Terror Drills on Day of 9/11)-Webster Tarpley 11) Exposing the Terrorism Hoax (State Sponsored, False Flag Deceptions)-Sam Lwin 12) Martial Law 9-11 (Military Fascist Dictatorship in the Future of USA)-Alex Jones 13) Public Issues, Discussions & Actions (What We Must Do) 14) Bonus ________________________________________________________________________ * For Windows XP and MAC OS X w/DVD player, On Web Pages, it’s best to have internet connection This DVD for Windows XP and MAC OS X is a compilation of the most popular 9/11 DVDs on the market today. It explores the many falsehoods and outright lies of the official story concerning the attacks of 9/11. To date we have not received a reasonable explanation as to why WTC 7, which was not hit by an airplane and did not have significant damage, collapsed at 5:20 pm on 9/11 like a controlled demolition (which normally takes several months to set up) or why we still have not seen a credible video of Flight 77 striking the Pentagon; furthermore, several of the alleged hijackers were reported to be alive by the BBC News. Since 9/11, the United States has started two wars in the Middle East on the basis that the attacks originated from there; it has called for preemptive wars in its crusade against terrorism. As concerned citizens, we must revisit the day of 9/11 and objectively reexamine the events and take appropriate actions lest we wake up too late and find ourselves in the next World War and a draconian police state at home. _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Senators You Have Been Served To Debunking The Official Version Of The 9/11 Events This DVD was hand delivered to the senate office clerks in 83 out of 100 senate offices in Washington DC during the week of 9/11/06. The other 17 senate offices had the DVD sent to them by certified mail. The clerks were instructed to give the DVD to the Military Legislative Assistant (MLA) for each senator. The names of the Military Legislative Assistants are listed in dark bold print with each listed Senator. Please call the senate offices of your state and ask to speak with these Military Legislative Assistants and get a response as to their reviewing of the information on the DVD. These Military Legislative Assistants should be giving a review to the senator as to the contents of this DVD. If this is not being done and you are not getting a reasonable (saying I didn't receive the DVD does not qualify as reasonable) response from your senator to this critical and important information at least you know they were served the information and had the opportunity to review it in their offices. The DVD’s were hand delivered and mailed by Matthew Naus. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ January 25th, 2008 To: Senator Russ Feingold, My name is Matthew Naus. I’m the veteran who presented a concern to you about the validity of our government’s official account of 9/11/01 in Grafton, Wisconsin on January 20th, 2008. You might remember our exchange became a little emotional. At the end of expressing my concerns I told you I would see you in Milwaukee in 5 days. I said this because I found out from your website that your next listening session was scheduled in Milwaukee on Friday, January 25th. The last thing you said to me after I said, “I’ll see you in 5 days” was “we’ll see about that”. Making that kind of statement concerns me. It concerns me because I might have a problem coming back to one of your listening sessions to continue expressing my serious concerns that challenge the government’s official account of 9/11/01. So, to avoid any type of problem that could possibly occur, if I were to show up, I decided to write you this letter and have it sent to your listening session in place of my personal appearance. I will also e-mail a copy of this letter to your senate offices. This letter will also be published on Veterans for 9/11 Truth Yahoogroups forum, 9/11TruthAction Yahoogroups forum, Take A Stand For 9/11 Truth website and a few other message forums that accept it. At the listening session in Grafton, Wisconsin I presented to you, critical information (DVD and written articles) that point to evidential facts that question the validity of our government’s official account/investigation of 9/11/01 which is called the 9/11 Commission Report. I also gave your senate office clerk similar information which you can find on my website (http://www.ts911t.org/CallStateSenator.html) on or about September 12th, 2006 when I personally visited your Washington, DC senate office along with 82 other senate offices in the course of 2 days. Due to time restraints, I had to send the other 17 senate offices I didn’t visit a certified envelope containing the same information. The senate office clerks that were handed this information were instructed to deliver the information to the Military Legislative Assistant (MLA) for each senator. I also gave the clerks a website card with my e-mail address and phone number to give to the MLA. I took down the names of all these MLA’s and I collected most of the senate office cards for each senator and the MLA’s if they were available. The name of your Military Legislative Assistant that should’ve received this vital information was Emily Plagman. Given the critical nature of this information, I would think that your MLA has informed you of such information. Over the course of 16 months I haven’t heard of one senator questioning the validity of our government’s official account of 9/11. I have heard a few members of congress question it and one of them (a woman) is not a member of congress anymore. Senator Feingold, you have now been given this kind of critical information again. Put directly in your hands by a war veteran of this country. The DVD I gave you has three documentaries and a lecture given by David Ray Griffin given on September 14th, 2006 titled, September 11th Should The Truth Be Revealed Or Concealed. The titles of the documentaries are: 9/11 Mysteries, Terror Storm and Loose Change 2nd Edition. I also gave you 5 articles written by Alan Miller, founder of the website Patriots Question 9/11. December 4th, 2007 Eight Senior Republican Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 - "Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False" http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_071202_seven_senior_republi.htm September 23rd, 2007 Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070922_seven_cia_veterans_c.htm December 13th, 2007 Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientist Call For New 9/11 Investigation http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_071211_seven_senior_federal.htm January 5th, 2008 Eight U.S. State Dept. Veterans Challenge Official Count of 9/11/01 http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_080104_eight_u_s__state_dep.htm January 14th, 2008 Twenty-Five US Military Officers Challenge Official Count of 9/11/01 http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_080112_twenty_five_u_s__mil.htm I now have video of you receiving this vital information on Youtube. As a veteran of this nation who served in Vietnam, received an honorable discharge and as a citizen of the State of Wisconsin, which is the state you represent, I expect you to do your job as a senator and take a thorough look and evaluate this vital information that questions the validity of our government’s official investigation of 9/11. This vital information proves that there was treason, of the highest order, by some of the top administrators of our government and some high ranking military leaders. There also was absolute control over the mainstream media to perpetuate a cover-up story that 19 terrorists did it with box cutters lead by a man who lives in a cave. The mainstream media has also squashed any real investigative reporting. If something did get out that contradicted the official cover-up story it was dropped quickly from the national news with very little or no follow-up investigative reporting. This can only mean that those individuals that have that kind of absolute control over the mainstream media must be involved with this heinous crime. In other words, there was a conspiracy with some of our government/military and corporate leaders along with those individuals that have absolute control of our mainstream media networks. Anyone with even a little reasonable intellect and sound judgment (half-a-brain) should be able to see that Americans were not told the truth about 9/11. All they have to do is take the time to research this subject using alternative media which includes reading articles, watching 9/11 Truth documentaries on the internet or on DVD’s, listening to speeches or lectures by credible people, observing pictures and videos on the internet and listening to alternative media internet radio. In other words, “It’s a no-brainer”. Of course we will need a citizen’s independent investigation created to verify all this so I expect you to call for one Senator Feingold. I also expect the other 99 senators along with all those in the House of Representatives to put their political loyalty and fear aside and call for a citizen’s independent investigation of 9/11/01. We surely can’t have those that are suspected of treason to create their own investigative committee/team, selecting the ones they want to be on the committee and then producing a report such as the 9/11 Commission Report, now can we. At the present time there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of American citizens that question the validity of our government’s official account of 9/11/01. The security of our nation and its people are at great risk because some of our government/military and corporate leaders think nothing of killing close to 3000 innocent American citizens to obtain their inhuman political objectives of starting wars with other nations, killing their innocent civilians and putting our nations military troops in grave danger with over 3000 of them already killed and many more thousands wounded. Senator Feingold, I will be expecting you to start taking the necessary steps that are needed to begin a citizen’s independent investigation of 9/11/01 regarding the validity of our government’s official account of 9/11. I know you have enough intellect, but I’ll reserve my opinion of your sound judgment until I see how you handle this critical information. If you continue to ignore this vital information then I expect you to remove yourself from office for dereliction of duty. I also hope other Americans who read this e-mail letter will send (use registered or verified mail with receipts) vital information regarding the validity of our government’s official account of 9/11 to their senators and congressmen, or hand deliver it as I did. Tell them that you expect them to evaluate the information and call for a citizen’s independent investigation of 9/11/01. If they don’t, they should also remove themselves from office, for dereliction of duty. We need senators and congressman that have the courage to overcome fear, be independent and serve their constituents, not their political parties and lobbyists. Only then will we truly have a balance of power in this country as our founding fathers had designed it. With this balance of power we will then be able to eliminate those that try to create false flag operations in order to wage war on defenseless nations for their own greed and political objectives. Senator Feingold, I’m fully aware that the steps I have taken here and listed below won’t guarantee that you will take any legislative action to create a citizen’s independent investigation of 9/11/01. I want you to realize that what I have done here is document the steps I have taken, a sort of historical record, in the case that you choose to ignore this critical and vital information and do nothing at all with it. If you choose this course of inaction, I want you to be aware of a future time, a time when the truth about 9/11/01 will come to light, a time when we will judge those that were entrusted with the security of our nation and who took an oath to preserve, protect and defend our Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that those entrusted were presented with this critical and vital information that seriously questions our government’s official account of 9/11/01, and that those entrusted failed to do their duty to protect the citizens of the United States of America. Hand delivering to your senate office in DC critical information that questions the validity of our government’s official account of 9/11 on or about September 12th, 2006. That critical information is outlined here: http://www.ts911t.org/CallStateSenator.html Making a video recording at your listening session in Grafton, Wisconsin on January 20th, 2008 showing me handing you more critical information that questions the validity of our government’s official account of 9/11. That video recording can be watched here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AdgyRJD__E Having a copy of this e-mail letter I wrote delivered to you on January 25th, 2008 at the Milwaukee Public Library in Milwaukee, Wisconsin where you are holding a listening session and submitted to your website contact page: http://feingold.senate.gov/contact_opinion.html P.S. This letter was delivered to Senator Feingold in Milwaukee on 1/25/08 at the Milwaukee Public Library at approximately 4:00 pm. One of the senator’s, aides, a Karen Ramsey, was handed the letter and she said she would give it to the senator. Matthew Naus Vietnam Veteran Co-Founder: Veterans For 9/11 Truth Founder: Take A Stand For 9/11 Truth This is the e-mail response generated letter acknowledging he received my e-mail letter of concern. I will be waiting to hear from Senator Feingold on this matter because he did receive my name, e-mail address and mailing address. Senator Russ Feingold - Do not reply to this message" <senator@feingold.senate.gov> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert To: nausmr@yahoo.com Subject: Thank you for your message Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:09:57 -0500 Dear friend, Thank you for taking the time to e-mail me and let me know your thoughts on matters of concern to you. Hearing from Wisconsinites is my most important source of information and one of the things I enjoy most about my job. Constituents who have included their name, e-mail address, and mailing address in their message will receive a response from me addressing the issues raised. If you did not include an e-mail and mailing address, I encourage you to resend your original message with this information (visit http://feingold.senate.gov/contact.html to resubmit your contact information and message). At this time, I am only able to respond to e-mails that are sent individually, not to mass-generated e-mails. However, the views expressed in any mass-generated e-mail that includes a Wisconsin address will be recorded. If you have a time sensitive question, please feel free to contact one of my offices by calling one of the numbers listed below. Thank you for writing me, I look forward to hearing from you on other issues of importance to you. Sincerely, Russell D. Feingold United States Senator |
 |
| Historical Record Of Responses From Congressional Members Regarding The Validity Of Our Government's Official Account Of 9/11/01 Total: 6 Responses |
| Historical Record Of Contacts Made To Congressional Members Regarding The Validity Of Our Government's Official Account Of 9/11/01 Total: 106 Contacts |
| Published on 911blogger.com (http://www.911blogger.com) AE911Truth: Letter to Congressman Robert Wexler By Reprehensor Created 2008-06-29 15:45 Richard Gage, AIA Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc. 2342 Shattuck Ave., Suite 189 Berkeley, CA 94704 www.AE911Truth.org [1] June 27, 2008 Via Electronic Mail to: lisa.white@mail.house.gov [2] The Honorable Robert Wexler 2241 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Wexler: My name is Richard Gage, AIA, a 20-year licensed practicing architect and member of the American Institute of Architects. I am founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc., and I am asking for your help in a matter of grave importance to the United States of America. Just over a year ago, I heard on a radio program new facts and compelling arguments regarding the terrible events at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. I was stunned. After completing some investigation, I realized that we had not been told the truth about the events of that day. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth was born and we began an online petition drive for fellow architects and engineers who are also determined to learn and publicize what really happened to the three World Trade Center Towers that collapsed on 9/11. We developed a multimedia presentation that exposes the myth of the official explanation using simple, rational forensic inquiry and basic physics. I travel the country speaking to building professionals and others to expose the fallacies. The response to this presentation is the same everywhere I go. A simple show of hands before and after reveals that about 90% of those who believe the "fire-weakened steel" hypothesis come to accept the "controlled demolition with explosives" hypothesis after the presentation. The explanations of the destruction of the iconic Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 offered by FEMA and NIST defy laws of physics. This is easy to prove and has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The existing, prevalent physical evidence shows that the explanations offered cannot be true. That such serious inconsistencies remain unaddressed, and that additional questions remain unanswered – even unasked – is untenable. We must pursue them now. AE911Truth.org operates an increasingly popular website that receives more than a thousand daily visits. We host over 2,000 petition signers, of whom more than 400 are degreed/licensed architects and engineers. Our licensed A/E's have agreed to uphold a code of ethics upon obtaining their licensure and they are meeting that obligation today by responding with great courage to the myth that we know as 9/11. They ask the following questions and document these observations, which are just a few of many that remain unanswered or ignored by those who, at the behest ultimately of the White House, directed the official investigations: • Why did more than 100 FDNY first responders describe, in great detail, the sounds of explosions and flashes of light that they saw and heard at the onset, and during, the collapse? Why did we not know about these 10,000 pages of FDNY "oral history" evidence until August, 2005 – and only then after a court order for their release? FDNY's own Chief of Safety, Albert Turi, and FDNY's nationally recognized Chief, Ray Downey, the "premiere collapse expert in the country" according to a fellow chief, both spoke of the presence of explosives in the Towers prior to their failures. More than 100 testimonies referring to multiple, violent explosions were ignored by the 9/11 Commission, NIST and FEMA. • What was the energy source, and through what mechanism was it applied, that pulverized 400,000 cubic yards of concrete into a fine powder that blanketed Manhattan? Calculations show that the energy requirement for this was greater than the available gravitational potential energy of the structures. Is this the same energy source that is responsible for the complete obliteration of more than 1,100 human bodies that were never found? • How were massive structural steel members hurled from the Twin Towers at 70 mph – some of them landing 600 feet away? • Why were most windows within 400 feet of each tower blown out? • Why were virtually no floors found at the base of either Twin Tower? There were originally 110 floors – each of them one acre in size. What explains the disappearance of 220 acres of four-inch thick concrete and steel decking? • Why were there explosive ejections of dust & gases (squibs) 20, 40 and 60 stories below the rapidly descending "collapse" in each tower? These can be seen in many publicly available videos and show rapidly ejecting pulverized building materials – over 200 feet a second. • How did the elevated building mass destroy 80,000 tons of structural steel at near free-fall speed , and with such radial symmetry? Given the asymmetrical structural and fire damage and the tendency of any disorder to grow over time (as described by the Second Law of Thermodynamics), the falling building sections should have "rolled off" of the intact sections below, resulting in only partial collapses. • Given that open-air jet fuel fires and normal office fires both burn at a maximum of around 1,500° F., and the melting point of steel is around 2,700° F., what thermal energy source produced the tons of molten metal observed flowing out of the South Tower shortly before its collapse – and also seen for weeks after 9/11/01 in the basements of the Twin Towers and Building 7 by numerous witnesses, including the WTC structural engineer, Leslie Robertson. • What explains the chemical evidence of thermite , an incendiary material found on the ends of steel beams? In Appendix C of its BPAT Report, FEMA documented that "evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure." This is clearly not a feature of gravitational collapse, or jet fuel or office fires. • What is the source of the billions of microspheres consisting of previously molten iron in all the pulverized concrete of the World Trade Center? The United States Geological Survey, in its "Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust Report," and RJ Lee Group, Inc., in its December 2003 WTC Dust Signature Report: Composition and Morphology, both document these once-molten drops of metal without explanation. These microspheres also contain the chemical signature of thermite, an incendiary material used to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter. • Why did Building 7 start its sudden and uniform collapse at an acceleration rate nearly that of a body in free fall? Video analysis shows the upper portion of the structure accelerating at the maximum rate gravity allows. This can only mean that the structure below offered no resistance. What mechanism can account for the simultaneous failure of the critical number and distribution of columns required to produce this rate of acceleration? NIST now attributes the catastrophic collapse of Building 7 to "normal office fires," with little to no contribution from falling debris or diesel fuel. At this suggestion by NIST, are we to suddenly accept that our understanding of fire science, materials and structural behavior has been deeply flawed? The American Institute of Architects has steadfastly resisted changes to the building codes after 9/11! Here is the potent 5-minute AE911Truth executive summary testimony delivered to NIST on Dec 18, 2007. On behalf of the more than 2,000 petition signers at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth – and of the thousands of citizens becoming aware of this deception regarding the destruction of these three high-rises on 9/11 – I urge you to spend ONE HOUR of your undivided attention to review the stunning evidence that answers these crucial questions. Joel Hirschorn, Ph.D., Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, and AE911Truth.org petition signer, states "First, let the technical truths emerge. Then, if necessary, cope with the inevitable political and conspiracy issues." We have the technical expertise to support your own research into the collapses of the 3 World Trade Center high-rise "collapses" on 9/11, and we offer ourselves in service to you. Respectfully, Mr. Richard Gage, AIA cc: Members of the Board, AE911Truth.org, Inc. References: http://www.ae911truth.org/ [3]. http://www.ae911truth.net/ppt_web/slideshow.php [4]. http://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7.php [5]. http://www.ae911truth.org/signpetition.php [6]. http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_5_118Witnesses_World... [7]. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/concrete.html [8]. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/mushrooming.html [9]. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/expulsion.html [10]. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/steel.html [11]. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/squibs.html [12]. http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Journal_5_PTransferRoss.pdf [13]. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/symmetry.html [14]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_jiCyMkrRM [15]. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_... [16]. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JLobdillThermiteChemist... [17]. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/WTC_apndxC.htm [18]. http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf [19]. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200611/911-Acceleration-Study-... [20]. http://www.911blogger.com/node/13263 [21] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source URL: http://www.911blogger.com/node/16384 Links: [1] http://www.AE911Truth.org [2] mailto:lisa.white@mail.house.gov [3] http://www.ae911truth.org/ [4] http://www.ae911truth.net/ppt_web/slideshow.php [5] http://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7.php [6] http://www.ae911truth.org/signpetition.php [7] http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_5_118Witnesses_WorldTradeCenter.pdf [8] http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/concrete.html [9] http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/mushrooming.html [10] http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/expulsion.html [11] http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/steel.html [12] http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/squibs.html [13] http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Journal_5_PTransferRoss.pdf [14] http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/symmetry.html [15] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_jiCyMkrRM [16] http://www.journalof911studies. com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buildings_Completely_Collapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf [17] http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JLobdillThermiteChemistryWTC.pdf [18] http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/WTC_apndxC.htm [19] http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf [20] http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200611/911-Acceleration-Study-Proves-Explosive-Demolition.pdf [21] http://www.911blogger.com/node/13263 |